U.S. Supreme Court rules unanimously that California's unique exactions rule is unconstitutional. But will it really require California cities and counties to scale back on exactions?

But it was less clear how the justices would instruct local governments about how to apply narrower exaction rules to General Plans.

They could simply box in California cities on nexus and proportionality. Or, led by Thomas and Alito, they could throw the bomb and say development is a right and not a privilege

By taking a development fee case from El Dorado County, the U.S. Supreme Court may have the chance to narrow current limitations on exactions -- or get rid of them altogether.

Traffic mitigation fee conforms to Nollan/Dolan doctrine, appellate court rules.

Appellate court strikes down CEQA challenge on bridge project, saying the impact of wildfire safety issues on the project isn't a topic of analysis.

Court also concludes the requirement calling for all roads to be built before any private development is constructed runs afoul of the Nollan/Dolan doctrine.

Small communities are fighting the stores, but usually they are allowed by local zoning. >>read more

In another Dollar General case, appellate court also says historic review is not a substitute for CEQA. >>read more